Bladder sling lawsuit settlements are now being awarded to women who suffered serious injures after undergoing procedures to repair stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with surgical mesh products. Bladder slings have recently been linked to complications including allergic reactions, erosion, fistulas, abscesses, irritative voiding symptoms, detrusor instability, infections, and vaginal bleeding. If you or somebody you know is suffering from bladder sling complications, you may be entitled to compensation.
Free Bladder Sling Lawsuit Settlement Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured or suspect that you may have complications directly linked to a bladder sling, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit and we can help.
What’s the Problem?
Stress urinary incontinence, or the involuntary release of urine during routine physical activities, is a common condition that typically occurs as a result of childbirth, hysterectomies, or menopause. In women who have this condition, weakened muscles and ligaments cause the bladder to drop from its normal position. When this occurs, simple physical activity or movement, including laughing or coughing, can cause the unintentional release of urine.
Bladder slings are long, narrow strips of synthetic mesh that are surgically placed under the urethra to return it to its proper position. The goal of bladder sling placement is to relieve pressure on the bladder and eliminate the unintentional release of urine. Unfortunately, in many cases, what recipients have reported is that the sling does not fix the problem at all.
Bladder Sling Complications
Bladder slings have been linked to the following complications:
- erosion through vaginal epithelium
- pain, including dyspareunia
- urinary problems
- recurrence of prolapse and/or incontinence
- bowel, bladder, and blood vessel perforation
- vaginal scarring
- mesh erosion
Landmark Bladder Sling Lawsuit Settlement
In July 2012, a California woman was awarded $5.5 million after a jury concluded that C.R. Bard’s Avaulta Plus bladder sling was to blame for her ongoing medical problems. Bard has since pulled its line of Avaulta mesh off the market. In January 2013, the first of nearly 2,000 lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division kicked off in New Jersey state court. The injured plaintiff, who has undergone 18 revision surgeries, said the device caused her permanent damage. The law offices of Schmidt & Clark, LLP, are currently accepting potential bladder sling lawsuits on behalf of women injured by mesh devices made by Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division, C.R. Bard, Boston Scientific, and American Medical Systems (AMS).
Am I Eligible to Receive a Bladder Sling Lawsuit Settlement?
The Medical Device Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in bladder sling lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new bladder sling lawsuits in all 50 states.
Free Bladder Sling Lawsuit Settlement Evaluation: Again, if you or a loved one has been injured or suspect that you may have complications directly linked to a bladder sling, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit and we can help.